Probably the same. or humanity will be gone or just a few poeple on earth. who know lol
Answer:
The correct answer is C. Francisco Vázquez de Coronado planned to search for Cíbola by relying on Friar Marcos de Niza to be his guide.
Explanation:
Cibola was a legendary city that was believed to be located somewhere in the American southwest. According to tradition it possessed unprecedented wealth.
As the Spaniards began to discover the New World, the idea arose that the city of Cibola might be located on this continent. In 1527, an expedition by the Spanish explorer Pánfilo de Narváez was shipwrecked off the coast of modern-day Texas. Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca was one of the few survivors, who said they had heard the Indians talk about cities of enormous wealth.
Cibola has also been described by Marcos de Niza, a Franciscan monk, who claimed to have seen one of the cities from a distance on a journey of discovery.
In 1540, an expedition of the Spanish explorer Francisco Vásquez de Coronado set out to discover these seven cities and seize the alleged riches. However, the journey turned into a disappointment and many of the expedition members died along the way.
An anti Semitic conspiracy theory is a false claim that claims that Jews are behind something that they’re really not, or it blames Jews for something they’re not responsible for. For example, conspiracy theorists and anti semites claim that Jews own all the banks in the world, but that is false. They also have claimed a few hundred years ago that the Jews kill Christian children and use their blood on matzah, but that is also false. All this is done because anti semites are looking for a scapegoat to blame all their problems on, or they just hate Jews
Here is the answer of the given question above. The two primary sources of <span>conflict related to religion according to The Dalai Lama in "The Role of Religion in Modern Society" are RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY and POLITICO-ECONOMIC FACTORS. According to the Dalai Lama, if we lived in a world with only one religion, there would be a little chance of questioning the truth of that religion. Hope this answer helps.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
What does Fortas mean when he states "if we are not to . . . Teach youth to discount important principles of our government as mere platitudes"?
What judge Fortas meant was that American youngsters that are limited in their rights as students would be disappointed and are going to find it very hard to truly believe in the idea that the government has a true interest in them. Students would doubt the merits of the government.
We are talking about Abe Fortas (1910-1982), who considered that students could use armbands and that did not interfere with other youngsters because these bands did not threaten other students neither represent a risk. He thought that students just were exerting their right to express their opinion,
