Answer:
individuals will tend to become free riders, and private firms will have difficulty generating enough revenue to produce an efficient quantity of the good.
Explanation:
A public good is a good that is non excludable and non rivalrous. Everyone has assess to the statue and because one person is enjoying the view of the statue does not means another person cannot enjoy the view of the statue
The free rider problem is a form of market failure. It occurs when people benefit from a good or service of communal nature and do not pay to enjoy these services.
Because a public good is non-excludable, the problem of free rider increases so private firms would be unable to generate adequate revenue
Answer: D because it is D
Answer:
$29,750
Explanation:
Since the Annual Payments of $53,343 are all equal for the period of 10 years at 8.5% installment note, therefore we Simple interest formula here to calculate the interest amount;
I = Prt
P = Principal Amount = $350,000
r = Interest Rate = 8.5%
t = time = 10-year
I = Interest = 350,000 x 0.085 x 10 = 297,500
Hence, the first annual payment of interest expense will be:
= 297,500 / 10 = $29,750
Answer: in personam jurisdiction
Explanation: The “long-arm statute,” is a law in majority of states that explains when a court can have in personam jurisdiction over parties who do not reside in that state. Certain conditions must be met for the court to have this jurisdiction. In general, the cause of action should have occurred in the state where the case is being filed; the defendant was personally served with the court papers in the state; or the defendant has a minimum contact with the state.
In personam jurisdiction is defined as a court's jurisdiction over the parties in a lawsuit, that is, it has both the authority to rule on the law and evidences of a suit and the power to enforce its decision upon all parties to the suit.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Accept the USA distributor demand. It is even better for Tetsu compared to Japan.
Explanation:
Considering both the distributors in Japan and the U.S. request a 20% margin for the retails of Tetsu's devices, accepting the offer of the U.S. company represents a good deal. Businesses are not handled the same in Japan and the U.S. Both countries have different policies. Tetsu must consider that the U.S. is a bigger market and that its devices are imported in the U.S., implying there could be tariffs imposed. Tough, if the U.S. distributor requests the same margin a Japanese distributor does to start businesses, <em>the deal will be in Tetsu's favor</em>.
