Answer:
0.41
Explanation:
The computation of the weight of security Y in the minimum variance portfolio is shown below:-
Weight of security X = Standard deviation of security Y ÷ (Sum of the standard deviation of securities)
= 39% ÷ (39% + 27%)
= 39% ÷ 66%
= 59.01%
Weight of security Y = 1 - Weight of security X
= 1 - 59.01%
= 0.41
Answer:
B) 1.7
Explanation:
GDP deflator simply shows the occurring event of the level of prices in the economy which is why It is often the ratio of nominal GDP to real GDP.
GDP deflator in 2009 will be:
Norminal GDP
Cost of apple= $1 in 2009
Apple produced =5 in 2009
Cost of oranges= $1.50 in 2009.
Orange produce= 5 in 2009
$1.00*(5)+$1.50*(5)
=5+7.5
=$12.50
Real GDP
Cost of apple= $0.50 in 2002
Apple produced =5 in 2002
Cost of oranges= $1 in 2002
Orange produce= 5 in 2002
0.50*(5)+$1.00*(5)
=2.5+5
=$7.50
GDP deflator = Nominal GDP/Real GDP)
=$12.50/$7.50
=1.666
approximately 1.7
Keynesian economists believe: <span>government can implement policy proposals that can positively impact the economy
Keynesian economist generally believed that the Economic situation in a country is a direct result from both private and public sector activities simultaneously, so both positive and negative things could derive from both sectors</span>
Answer:
The Pandemic has made chicken more expensive, in order to offset this effect to consumers, government subsidized the price of chickens by a per-unit subsidy. If it wants to study the substitution effect of this subsidy, the government should imposed a Lump-sum tax.
False
Explanation:
The government should have imposed a lump-sum subsidy if it really wanted to study the substitution effect of the subsidy instead of imposing a lump-sum tax. This subsidy should be granted to chicken farmers to reduce their production costs, which will in turn reduce the cost of chicken to the consumers. A lump-sum tax sounds like a contradictory effort to offset the high cost of chicken on the consumers.
