1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naily [24]
3 years ago
6

Why is 1807 significant? Question 2 options: British Parliament outlawed slavery in Britain and it all of its colonies. The Brit

ish Parliament responded to the popular outcry and abolished the slave trade. This did not end slavery. The Sultan of the Ottoman Empire issued a similar law restricting the slave trade. The government of Egypt signed an agreement with Britain restricting the slave trade.
History
2 answers:
evablogger [386]3 years ago
8 0

The year 1807 is significant because the British government outlawed the slave trade.

olchik [2.2K]3 years ago
3 0

1807 is significant because the British Parliament responded to the popular outcry and abolished the slave trade. This did not end slavery.

Answer: Option B and C

<u>Explanation: </u>

The British Parliament was responsive to its subjects and hence was sensitive towards the issue of slavery. In line with the growing outrage against slavery among the people of Britain, the Parliament passed the Slave Trade Act in 1807 and banned any new trade of slaves.

It allowed to continue the practice of slavery for they also had to think of those who had paid huge amounts to buy slaves.

You might be interested in
What did spain lose as a result of the spanish-american war apex?
Serga [27]
USA had a better navy.   (The White Fleet?)   
USA was backed by guerrlia warfare in the Philippines.  

USA had terrible guns going against the Spanish in the San Juan hill. 
The USA Springfield Gun 1892 - 99 side clip was highly inefficient compared to the Spanish Mauser.    
The Spanish had more firepower the Maxim beat the Gattling Gun.  
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Colonies were mostly run for the benefit of mother countries, but some people believed the colonial system helped everyone becau
Nuetrik [128]

He was an advocate of colonialism, and George Orwell called him a prophet of British imperialism, while still defending him from the attacks of those who declared him a fascist. Kipling is still viewed by many as imperialist and racist. His "Jungle Book", which is part of a compulsory editorial, is considered by many critics to be racist.

Explanation:

  • In line with the general beliefs of the time, Kipling believed that people of European heritage had better educational conditions, generally better living conditions, and that since they already knew Christianity, they should spread his message.
  • At first glance, it was clear to him that the <em>"tawdry rule of kings", </em>a system in which the natives obey and enslave, does not work. The natives were constantly rebelling and a picture of them as <em>"half devil and half child" </em>was created.
  • Yet the fact remains that Europeans thought their value system and way of life were better and should be imposed on unenlightened nations.

Learn more on Kipling on

brainly.com/question/2220847

brainly.com/question/4105975

brainly.com/question/7210378

#learnwithBrainly

8 0
3 years ago
A restaurant customer left ​$1.80 as a tip. The tax was 6% and the tip was 20​% of the after tax cost. Which information is not
Molodets [167]

Answer:

The % of tax, $10.80

Explanation:

without knowing whether or not taxes were paid, you could still find out the bill with the tips. Let me know if this makes sense or if i still need to explain.

6 0
3 years ago
Aristotle judged a government's morality on whether those running the government worked for the people or for themselves.
RoseWind [281]
True, he did believe this. I hope it helps 
6 0
3 years ago
how was the Berlin Wall a symbol for a world divided between the two camps of nato and the Warsaw Pact
sergij07 [2.7K]

Answer:

The Berlin Wall divided Berlin in two parts: East Berlin and West Berlin. The former was the capital of the communist German Democratic Republic, and the latter was a western, democratic enclave born from the occupation zones of the Western Allies after WWII.

Berlin was a symbol of the division of Europe and the confrontation between capitalism and Western democracy on one side, and communism, on the other side. Both parts of the city were sort of showrooms for their systems. American  troops were stationed in the western part, and Soviet troops were stationed on the eastern part. The wall ran along the boundaries of the former Soviet zone with the western occupation zones. So, here NATO and  Warsaw Pact forces stood side by side. For all these reasons, it´s said the Berlin Wall was a symbol of a Cold War world divided in two camps.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which two types of courts are found in the state judicial branch
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following areas is associated with Washington agriculture?
    8·1 answer
  • How did French Enlightenment philosophers like Diderot influence religious beliefs?
    11·2 answers
  • What was constantinoples government
    15·1 answer
  • Unit 2 Test Review
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these people is demonstrating an important value of Christianity? A. A baker who gives free loaves of bread to poor mem
    6·1 answer
  • What were some of the environmental benefits of the epidemics in the Americas post-European migration?
    6·1 answer
  • Do you think Congress should have the Power both to raise and spend money?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did Hitler kill citizens of his own nation during WWII? (common lit)
    10·2 answers
  • 谁知道哲学的起源?尤其是古希腊哲学的那一段历史,真的比较感兴趣呢
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!