The writs of assistance was an act put into place by the British government that allowed them to search anything if they felt that smuggled goods were inside.
Vlad the impaler died in January of 1477 Hope this helps you :D
<u>Freedom of liberty</u> was one of the four freedoms, president Roosevelt's shorthand for American purposes in world war ii.
<h3><u>What do the four freedoms actually mean?</u></h3>
There has only been one speech in American history that has sparked so many books, films, paintings by renowned artists, parks, important foreign awards, and a United Nations resolution on human rights.
The 1941 State of the Union Address by Franklin D. Roosevelt is also referred to as the "Four Freedoms" speech. In it, he presented a stirring picture of a society in which everyone was free to practice their religion, speak their minds, and be without hunger or fear.
The world was changed by it after it was given on January 6, 1941. The speech's contents are memorialized in marble at Four Freedoms Park on Roosevelt Island in New York, are portrayed in Norman Rockwell's paintings, and served as the basis for the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was accepted by the UN.
Learn more about president Roosevelt with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/17255132
#SPJ4
Answer:
Rationalism vs Puritanism Rationalism. A form of religion where instead of believing in a higher been, Science and reasoning are what is lived by. ... While the Puritans believed that everyone had a pre-destined faith, Rationalists believed in no such thing.
Explanation:
Responses will vary. A sample response follows: Now that the Court has reached a decision, albeit a rare unanimous decision, Chief Justice John Roberts will assign the task of composing the majority opinion to either himself or an associate justice. This opinion will articulate the reasoning behind the Court’s decision to overturn the appellate decision. However, while there wouldn’t be a dissenting opinion (there were no dissenters), one or more justices from the majority may write a concurring decision in which they reach the same conclusion as the rest of the Court, but for different reasons.
