<span>"The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist" is an indefensible claim. The others can be proven or at least debated over because at some point in time all of them have true and false. For instance, the majority of congress and the President have been from the same political party. Also, the majority of congress and the President have NOT been from the same political party. Therefore, you can compare the difference between true and false. Political boundaries have always existed. As a result, you cannot comfortably compare it to anything else.</span>
<span>Hola!
In the politics of the United States, a spoil system is a practice where a political party, after winning an election, gives government jobs to its voters as a reward for working toward victory, and as an incentive to keep working for the party-as opposed to a merit system, where offices are awarded on the basis of some measure of merit, independent of political activity.
Hope I helped! :)</span>
<u>Middle class emerged in Western Europe by the following</u>:
- New social groups emerged during the industrial revolution, industrialists, professionals and businessmen who believed that social structure were built based on "merit" and not "birth" were a part of the middle class.
- The people believed that the society must work based on "equal opportunities", "laws", and "principles of freedom" rather than based on a privileged account of the birth.
- The middle class included nationalist who had liberal thinking and educated that led to revolutions by demanding the end of aristocratic privileges and creating a national unity.
Byzantine cities buzzed with merchants and traders from many far-off lands.
The correct answer is this one: "Roosevelt would treat Americans with fairness and respect." The guiding principle of Roosevelt's square deal is that <span>Roosevelt would treat Americans with fairness and respect. Roosevelt will treat the Americans in the future with the sincerity of fairness and respect.</span>
