Question

WHY UNEQUAL ACCESS TO BASC SERVICES AMOUNT TO SOCIAL INJUSTICE

Answer 1

Answer:

some basic services are inherently necessary for a decent living. housing, education, healthcare, water, transport, electricity, etc. these things are necessary to live. when certain people or communities don’t have access to these basic services, the result will most likely be death or extreme poverty with the abundance of resources available in the world today, there is more than enough to provide for every human being on earth. however, the accumulation of wealth and resources coupled with the concept of doing things for profit, people will be denied access to these basic services because of the effective cost and the loss of profit. homelessness in the US could end with ~20 billion dollars. world hunger could be solved with ~40 billion dollars. solving these issues would be an immense benefit to the human condition and human life, and doing things for the prosperity of humanity is what society and community is about (note: socialism, communism). right now, Jeff Bezos is worth over 100 billion dollars. he could easily end homelessness in America, he could easily end world hunger. but he chooses not to because there is no profit to be made and there is no personal incentive (selfishness, I above we) to do so. I’m not saying he is required to do this, but I’m simply putting things in perspective about how easily these horrific issues could be resolved and we choose not to do so.

Answer 2

Resources are not distributed evenly, based on merit. Also, it is up to the people on how they utilize their resources. Not everyone takes advantage of what is provided to them.