Answer:A.As US citizens, both women and men are granted suffrage.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) (/ˈoʊbərɡəfɛl/ OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The 5–4 ruling requires all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities.[2][3]
Between January 2012 and February 2014, plaintiffs in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee filed federal district court cases that culminated in Obergefell v. Hodges. After all district courts ruled for the plaintiffs, the rulings were appealed to the Sixth Circuit. In November 2014, following a series of appeals court rulings that year from the Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits that state-level bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional, the Sixth Circuit ruled that it was bound by Baker v. Nelson and found such bans to be constitutional.[4] This created a split between circuits and led to a Supreme Court review.
Decided on June 26, 2015, Obergefell overturned Baker and requires all states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and to recognize same-sex marriages validly performed in other jurisdictions.[5] This established same-sex marriage throughout the United States and its territories. In a majority opinion authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court examined the nature of fundamental rights guaranteed to all by the Constitution, the harm done to individuals by delaying the implementation of such rights while the democratic process plays out,[6] and the evolving understanding of discrimination and inequality that has developed greatly since Baker.[7]
Prior to Obergefell, same-sex marriage had already been established by law, court ruling, or voter initiative in thirty-six states, the District of Columbia, and Guam.[3]
Answer:
A
Explanation:
unlike democrats Republicans want less govermant control
Answer:
The masses of the Vietnamese people were deprived of such benefits by the social policies inaugurated by Doumer and maintained even by his more liberal successors, such as Paul Beau
For sure:
<span>provides Goods are free to move across borders and boost economies.
</span><span>Consumers have access to a wider range of better quality products.
</span><span>The unified countries share military responsibilities. (The EU today mostly hold together when it is under attack (under the NATO) and generally back each other up when in a crisis (as seen when Russia makes threats, or under terrorist attack)
Not so sure:
</span><span>Provides economic benefits (i guess since they are trading, and so economy is boosted)
</span><span>Companies are able to spead across EU countries. (new companies can most likely move to different areas without as much restrictions as say, a company from China to Britain)
</span><span>
Most likely not:
</span>Citizens may live where they like, and boost the labor pool. (just because they are part of the EU, doesn't mean all of europe is together in one nation. They are still different nations within the EU)
hope this helps
