Amendment 13-abolition of slavery throughout us-Dred Scott v Stanford
Amendment 15-right to vote cannot be denied regardless of previous condition-United vs Reese
Amendment 19-women’s suffrage granted them right to vote-minor vs Happersett
Dred vs Scott-This case was about a man living in Illinois (a free state) with a slave (Dred Scott). When Dred Scott's owner died he became a free man, however Sanford's brother in law said otherwise. The laws said that he could be free, but others said that he was still a slave and that because of that he can't be a free man.
Us vs Reese-declared that the 15th amendment did not automatically protect the right of African Americans to vote (only listed the ways that states were not allowed to prevent them from voting)
Minor vs Happersett-presented herself at the polls in St. Louis in 1872 and when the registrar refused to permit her to vote, she and her husband sued him for denying her one of the "privileges and immunities of citizenship"; when they lost the case they appealed to the Supreme Court
I know this was a lot but hope it helped:)
It is an obligation that the Lord approves of, and the one who accepted the responsibility is justified in what he did by the Holy Spirit.
<h3>What significance does the Holy Spirit's Promise have?</h3>
This name-title is employed in relation to the Holy Ghost's sealing and ratifying power, which is the ability granted to him to ratify and approve human good deeds so that those deeds will be enforceable on earth and in heaven.
<h3>What is the Holy Spirit's primary function?</h3>
Personal testimony and revelation come from him. He can help us make decisions and defend us against threats to our physical and spiritual safety. He is referred to as the Comforter, and He is able to allay our anxieties and give us hope. We are sanctified by His power as we turn from our sins, accept salvific ordinances, and uphold our covenants.
To Know more about enforceable
brainly.com/question/27896350
#SPJ9
Answer:
It is B, once they started firing at each other there was no going back.
This is a question that only you can help with. Try going back and actually reading the problem again, then follow the directions.
Cortés' army besieged Tenochtitlan for 93 days before capturing the city thanks to superior weaponry and a devastating smallpox outbreak. Cortés' victory destroyed the Aztec empire, and the Spanish began to consolidate control over what became the colony of New Spain.
<h3>What impact did Spanish colonization have on the Aztecs?</h3>
Negative Impact: Empire Destruction
- Cortes defeated the Aztec Empire's capital city, Tenochtitlan, after three months of fighting. The emperor Cuauhtémoc was captured and executed later that year, and Cortes became ruler of the vast empire. The Aztecs who survived were extremely vulnerable to European diseases that were previously unknown to their culture, such as smallpox and typhus. Smallpox wiped out Tenochtitlan's population in 1521.
- According to the New World Encyclopedia, two subsequent epidemics killed 75 percent of the remaining population. Surviving Aztecs were forbidden from learning about their indigenous culture and were forced to read and write in Spanish. Many aspects of Aztec culture were lost for good.
Positive Impact: Lifestyle Enhancements
- Because they helped modernize the Aztec society, the Spanish had a positive impact on Aztec civilization. They introduced domestic animals, sugar, grains, and European farming practices to the Aztecs.
- Most notably, the Spanish abolished the Aztec practice of human sacrifice. According to the New World Encyclopedia, the Aztecs sacrificed human victims at each of their 18 annual festivals. Torture, such as shooting victims with arrows, burning them, or drowning them, was frequently used in human sacrifice rituals.
To learn more about Aztec Empire's refer to
brainly.com/question/876887
#SPJ4
