Amendment 13-abolition of slavery throughout us-Dred Scott v Stanford Amendment 15-right to vote cannot be denied regardless of previous condition-United vs Reese Amendment 19-women’s suffrage granted them right to vote-minor vs Happersett Dred vs Scott-This case was about a man living in Illinois (a free state) with a slave (Dred Scott). When Dred Scott's owner died he became a free man, however Sanford's brother in law said otherwise. The laws said that he could be free, but others said that he was still a slave and that because of that he can't be a free man. Us vs Reese-declared that the 15th amendment did not automatically protect the right of African Americans to vote (only listed the ways that states were not allowed to prevent them from voting) Minor vs Happersett-presented herself at the polls in St. Louis in 1872 and when the registrar refused to permit her to vote, she and her husband sued him for denying her one of the "privileges and immunities of citizenship"; when they lost the case they appealed to the Supreme Court I know this was a lot but hope it helped:)
If your friend is a business owner in a planned economy, then it would be the "central government" that decides how to allocate the productive resources he uses, since the government "plans" the economy as opposed to having supply and demand take place in the marketplace.
Answer: well I can’t type a whole essay but I can help. Use factual information write an essay wether you agree or disagree. Choose one the last paragraph will be your counterclaim which is the opposite.
Explanation: Basically write an essay stating what side you are on then write another essay or paragraph that is the opposite
