1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lozanna [386]
3 years ago
15

What two conclusions might a ruler of an empire draw from the decline of the Han, Roman, and Gupta empires?

History
2 answers:
Nostrana [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A strong, loyal army is necessary to protect the empire from invaders.

The government should try to prevent internal rebellions.

Explanation:

Sunny_sXe [5.5K]3 years ago
4 0

The Han, Roman and Gupta empires all fell do to invasion. A strong, loyal army is necessary to protect the empire from invasion. All of these empires were first weakened by a succession weak governments. The trust and faith in the government was eroded over time. Internal strife by the people because of declining abilities of the government to govern weaken the state. The government should try to prevent internal rebellions by maintaining good governance over the people.

You might be interested in
historians that came of age during the middle to late twentieth century tended to turn their attention toward
Andreas93 [3]
The historians that came of age during the middle to late twentieth century tended to turn their attention toward : Social and cultural events and themes
This refer to the period between 1960 - 1999.  many of them refer to the events that happen before this as  'history from below'

hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Many Northerners began to call for an end to Reconstruction because
san4es73 [151]

The answer is D I got a 100% on the unit review

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of Clinton’s foreign policy goals did the United States fail to achieve in Rwanda?
Ratling [72]

Answer:

it's defense of human rights

3 0
3 years ago
Analyzing What was the main reason that Anti-
Naddik [55]

Answer:

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.

Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Good evening! Can someone please answer this, ill give you brainliest and your earning 50 points. Would be very appreciated.
Grace [21]

Answer:Welfare programs are tax-payer funded and help those in need cope with financial stress and hardship. 

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is a benefit of a confederate government
    7·1 answer
  • The Crusades stimulated trade, banking, the growth of cities, and the rise of the middle class.
    12·1 answer
  • Ratifying the 13th Amendment, to abolish slavery, was one way the government attempted to give blacks the rights of full citizen
    5·2 answers
  • What were the LAST two states admitted to the union and in what year(s) did they join?
    5·2 answers
  • English. Were Native Americans have most likely to practice hunting and gathering?
    12·1 answer
  • In the excerpt, Crosby makes which of the following claims about the transmission of Old World diseases to the Americas?
    9·1 answer
  • According to new federalism who was responsible for funding wellfare programs
    8·1 answer
  • Is the government considered a consumer
    7·1 answer
  • I need both of them please
    14·1 answer
  • Ancient Chinese mathematician who is it?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!