Answer:
rely on the invisible hand of the market to reallocate resources,
Explanation:
The invincible hand was adams Smith's idea which is defined as an observable market force that helps the demand and supply of goods in a free market to attain equilibrium naturally without government intervention in the market thereby leaving the people alone to buy and sell freely among themselves . This would naturally choose type of goods to be produced and reduce resource waste by closing Down weak markets that produce less demanded products.
Answer:
Manufacturing and Merchandising businesses
Explanation:
The type of Business needed to make the product is known as MANUFACTURING business. This business buys raw materials and refined them into products that later sell in bulk to wholesalers.
On the other hand, Merchandising business is a form of business that involves buying refined products at wholesale price and then sell to the final consumers.
Hence, in this case, then Greece answer is MANUFACTURING and MERCHANDIZING Business.
Answer:
d. $2,950,000
Explanation:
The computation of amount of research and development costs charged is shown below:-
Amount of research and development costs = Direct materials + Personnel cost + Consulting fee paid to outsiders + Indirect costs + Depreciation
= $995,000 + $795,000 + $345,000 + $270,000 + $545,000
= $2,950,000
Therefore for computing the amount of research and development costs we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
Suppose that you purchased a conventional call option on growth in Non-Farm Payrolls (NFP) with an exercise price of 210,500 jobs. The NFP conventional contract pays out $85 for every job created in excess of the exercise price. a. What is the value of the option if job growth is 193,500.
The value of the option if job growth is 193,500 is $0.
Explanation:
Since the job growth of 193,500 is less than the exercise price of 210,500 jobs, the value of the option on the contract in the given question is Zero.
Therefore, the value of the option if job growth is 193,500 is $0.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
In order to achieve optimal employment level, the ratio of productivity between employees must be equal to the ratio between their wages, e.g. an employee who is 25% more productive, should earn 25% more.
In this case, the productive ratio is 15:20 or 3:4, while the wage ratio is 8:12 or 2:3. Since the wage ratio is lower than the productivity ratio (2:3 < 3:4), the two employees are not optimally employed.
