Answer:
There are whole lots of differences between the two political systems at that time. And this is largely because Igbo communities were too fragmented and each of the community was autonomous with its unique political system.
Looking at it closely, Igbo political system was acephalous. There was no specific head in most of the Igbo communities. Whereas, Yoruba political system was monocephalous. Each Yoruba community had a head — An Oba or a Baale.
Igbo people adopted gerontocracy as the Council of Elders effectively took up the functions of managing the affairs of the state. But, monarchy was in place among Yoruba people.
Unlike in Yoruba kingdoms, Igbo communities rarely had standing armies. Such arangement was usually made when there a war against an enemy.
Being a monarchy, the leadership transition was through heredity. Most times, a child of the deposed, abdicated or dead Oba succeeded him. Whereas, Igbo system was typically Republican. Neither Ofo nor Ozo title was attained through heredity, but through age and wealth.
Igbo people neither had taxation nor tribute system, but Yoruba people had a tribute system.
Unlike among the Igbo communities where each community was totally autonomous, many Yoruba kingdoms regarded Oyo as their political headquarters.
Igbo political system emphasized egalitarianism, age and persuasions; Yoruba political system was characterized by political power, legitimacy and check and balances.
Exaggeration.
Eye-Catching Headlines.
Sensational Language.
Anything that sells basically.
The founding fathers were influenced by Baron de Montesquieu ideas on the tripartite system, when they elaborated the drafts of the U.S. Vonstitution, basically, regarding the separation of powers.
Baron de Montesquieu(1689-1795) established a division of political presence. He considered a clear division of government bodies: a Legislature, an Executive, and a Judiciary.
The influence of this model is from the Roman Republic Constitution and the British Constitution. With this separation of powers, none of them by themselves could become an absolute power.
That is the case with the U.S. Constitution. James Madison, attracted by Montesquieu principles, prevent the corruption of power establishing the same principle but in the U.S. case, with a legislature(Congress), with a presidency(President), and the judiciary(the Supreme Court).
The closest answer is C. They were located in pre-Columbian <span>America</span>
The Articles provided a system for the Continental Congress to direct the American Revolutionary War<span>, conduct diplomacy with Europe and deal with territorial issues and Native American relations.</span>