Answer:
The criticism is true to a certain degree, and unjustified to another degree.
Explanation:
It is true in the sense that the U.S. has indeed lost a lot of manufacturing to Mexico, simply because Mexico has far lower labor costs, and U.S. manufacturers have decided to take advantage of that by taking their plants to Mexican states.
It is also true that Mexico has been running a trade surplus with the United States in recent years, mainly because of the large manufacturing sector that Mexico has been developing.
On the other hand, the criticism is unjustified because neither a trade deficit nor the moving of manufacturing to Mexico mean that the United States as a whole is in worst condition than before NAFTA. In fact, most economists agree that free trade is a good thing for the economy as a whole, and that most people benefit from the lower costs and specialization that trade brings about.
The problem lies then, in the people who lose their jobs: formerly unionized manufacturing workers from the Rust Belt, for example. These people need to be helped with government assitance, both in terms of welfare, and training, so that they can find new jobs and make ends meet in the meanwhile.
Answer:
The company should accept the idea because profit will increase by $24,000.
Explanation:
A company is currently selling 10,000 units of product monthly for $40 per unit.
The unit contribution margin is $27.
The company believes that spending $50,000 per month on advertising will allow them to increase the selling price to $45 and that sales will increase by 750 units per month.
The unit contribution margin is the difference between selling price and variable cost per unit.
An increase in the selling price of $5 will cause the contribution margin to increase by $5, from $27 to $32.
Profits is the product of contribution margin and number of output.
At initial price, the profit was
= 
= $270,000
At the new price the profit will be
= 
- $50,000
= $344,000 - $50,000
= $294,000
The increase in profit
= $294,000 - $270,000
= $24,000
<span>The nash</span> equilibrium would be A. <span> bp and the mini-mart will both not advertise.
The nash equilibrium happens when all of the competitors choose the decision that give the optimal outcome for both of them.
If Bp and mini-mart both choose not to advertise they both will have a similar profit.</span>
Answer:
Nominal interest rate (n) = 10% = 0.10
Inflation rate (i) = -2% = -0.02
Real interest rate (r) = ?
Application of Fisher's Equation
(I + n) = (1 + r)(1 + i)
(1 + 0.10) = (1 + r)(1 + -0.02)
1.10 = (1 + r)(0.98)
<u>1.10</u> = 1 + r
0.98
1.1224 = 1 + r
1.1224 - 1 = r
r = 0.1224 = 12.24%
Jimmer's real income will change by 12.24% next year.
Explanation:
In the determination of the rate of change in real income, there is need to apply Fisher's equation. The nominal rate and inflation rate have been given, thus, we will make the real rate the subject of the formula.
Jdhdhdhdjsuushdbdbdbudufjrjifufjfjfkfkfkididududjejdjdjfkkfjfjrufifiir
