Answer:
In the given context, the correct definition for an employee, would be that of an individual who executes orders to buy and sell for clients of his or her brokerage firm.
Explanation:
An employee is a person who is hired by an employer to execute functions that are necessary to his organization's full operation. In the context of the stockmarket, an employee of a company would not trade for his or her account, but for his employer's account, following their policies and intentions. Therefore, an employee is an individual who executes orders to buy and sell for clients of his or her brokerage firm.
Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
Answer:
I think you got it right*
Explanation:
I think this is the same question I took.
C relative price » sub effect & income effect
Answer:
$264,930
Explanation:
Land is an asset, an item of property plant and equipment (fixed asset). As such it is recorded at historical cost which includes the cost of the land as well as other cost incurred in making the land available for use net of the income generated in the process of making the asset available for use. Other cost may have been incurred in the process of purchasing the land but only the cost necessary to make the land available for use are capitalized.
Hence, the capitalized cost of the land is:
= $250,000 + $12,600 - $1,690 + $540 + $3,800 - $320
= $264,930
The cost of insurance will be expensed.
