Answer:
B) taught, pores
Explanation:
The students were TAUGHT that an accomplished scientist always PORES over the results of an experiment.
The statement that best describes the narrator in this excerpt is as follows:
- The narrator is not entirely truthful about his reasons for staying in Venice.
Thus, the correct option is B.
<h3>What is Narrator?</h3>
A narrator may be defined as an individual or personality who conveys a story, or a representative fashioned by an author to narrate a description.
The excerpt given below illustrates the situation of being enchanted with Venice and with a girl with a couple of black eyes that is recreating with his spirit. These are the absolute and authentic explanations for the narrator in Venice.
The complete question is as follows:
The romantic character of the place delighted me; I was very much amused by the air of adventure and intrigue that prevailed in this region of masks and gondolas; and I was exceedingly smitten by a pair of languishing black eyes, that played upon my heart from under an Italian mantle. So I persuaded myself that I was lingering in Venice to study men and manners. At least I persuaded my friends so, and that answered all my purpose.
What statement best describes the narrator in this excerpt?
Therefore, the correct option for this question is B, i.e. the narrator is not entirely truthful about his reasons for staying in Venice.
To learn more about Narrator, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/860877
#SPJ1
Answer:
The text shows that the animals expected a different outcome than the reality they are facing.
Explanation:
Orwell uses irony in this excerpt by showing how the animals goal at the beginning was to drive Mr. Jones away from the farm and establish there own society, Animalism, but ended in chapter 10 with their original commandments changed to one statement: “ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS. (Four legs good, two legs better.),there is no longer Equality between animals and they are all ruled by their dictator- leader, Napoleon, who (as well as the pigs), begin to act like humans. Here Orwell implies that there is no real difference between the two, which is how he uses irony in this excerpt.
(ps. This is my second time answering so im sorry if i made some mistakes
(,,>﹏<,,)
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Oedipus begs him to reveal who Laius’s murderer is, but Tiresias answers only that he knows the truth but wishes he did not. Puzzled at first, then angry, Oedipus insists that Tiresias tell Thebes what he knows. Provoked by the anger and insults of Oedipus, Tiresias begins to hint at his knowledge. Finally, when Oedipus furiously accuses Tiresias of the murder, Tiresias tells Oedipus that Oedipus himself is the curse. Oedipus dares Tiresias to say it again, and so Tiresias calls Oedipus the murderer. The king criticizes Tiresias’s powers wildly and insults his blindness, but Tiresias only responds that the insults will eventually be turned on Oedipus by all of Thebes. Driven into a fury by the accusation, Oedipus proceeds to concoct a story that Creon and Tiresias are conspiring to overthrow him.
(i beleve false is right, if not sorry if it is then yay)
It is when the conflict gets resolved. In a mystery it is when mystery is solved.
