Answer:
Explanation:
The English Civil Wars (1642-1651) stemmed from conflict between Charles I and Parliament over an Irish insurrection. ... However, at Marston Moor (July 2, 1644) Charles lost control of the north; and the following year, at Naseby (June 14, 1645) the Parliamentary forces led by Oliver Cromwell routed his main field army
<span>French settlers came to America for all the following reasons except adventure. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and the answer has come to your desired help.</span>
Simply put, by coercion.
There was a very simple process that followed:
(1) the Red Army invades the countries, on the pretext of "liberating" them - this gives a plausible veneer to a treacherous end;
(2) whilst occupying, Soviet commissars would prop up the local communist party (typically, enjoying only minimal support from the country's population, unless also nationalist) - this is so as to have a puppet regime-in-waiting;
(3) under Soviet occupation, typically some sort of a "referendum" or "plebiscite" will be held, at which SUDDENLY the voters will "decide" to abolish the previous constitution and to enact one that practically gives sole powers to the local communists - this is to give the effective coup d'etat a veneer of legitimacy;
(4) once installed in power, the communist party will effectively take over the machinery of state by staffing all key posts with its members;
(5) through the use of secret police and kangaroo courts, opposition, incl. those of the original governing class who did not have the good sense to escape, will be physically eliminated, sentenced to long prison terms, exiled, otherwise incarcerated;
(6) a the takeover of the state is usually followed by a takeover, through nationalisation or outright confiscation, of the economy, giving the regime financial muscle;
<span>(7) the established position will be upheld by the same means it was acquired and with unparalleled degree of ruthlessness, with the country taken over being treated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kremlin Holdings.</span>
Answer:
i dont think that russia is responsable for WWI but germany is, it had the resources to end it by withdrawing its blank cheque which offered suport to austria for its invasion to serbia. russian leaders knew that it would have been in a much stronger position to fight in two years, after having completed its rearmament plan.
Answer:
flower hfyytbtbtnt tnbnfbnfbnf
Explanation:
