1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natulia [17]
3 years ago
13

What argument does Paine make in paragraph 21 for why the colonists should rebel? A. Paine argues that the colonists are meant t

o be loyal to France, not Britain, so they can't feel bad about their rebellion. B. He asserts that, just as Britain rebelled against France, so too will the colonists rebel against Britain. C. He explains that the war is inevitable because Britain has not kept their promises. D. He says that the King is actually of French descent, making him French, and so England should be governed by France.
History
2 answers:
Naily [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D. He says that the King is actually of French descent, making him French, and so England should be governed by France.

Explanation:

Thomas Paine wrote his "Common Sense" as a from of an argument, propagating the independence of America from the British rule. In it, he touches on the topics of government and society, monarchy and the rule of succession etc. He challenged the authority of the British government in their colonization of the American states. Paine also said that since man ruling over another man is a sin, as found in the Bible, so also Britain's rule over America is unacceptable according to Christian values. He even pointed out that if the order of succession is hereditary, then considering the nationality of the  present king of England, William the Conqueror who is French, Britain should be under the rule of the French.  He advocates for the British government to leave America, and the Americans to fight for their independence against the colonizing rule of the British.

shusha [124]3 years ago
4 0
I believe c is the correct answer to your question.
You might be interested in
Which of the following actions, taken by Stalin, is a characteristic of a
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer: C) he jailed many of his rivals. his name actually means man of steel in russia.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Document 7a
mafiozo [28]
Based on this document, two ways President Polk proposed to address the issue of slavery in the <span>territories was to dictate which states would be free, and to allow the states to decide. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
I'll give you brainliest. Why did the Greeks write plays ?
My name is Ann [436]
For entertainment and religious reasons
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes challenges Nixon faced in his domestic policies?
Masja [62]

Answer:

The economic phenomenon of stagflation

7 0
2 years ago
Compare and contrast the changes in the government, economy, and society from the Romanov era under the tsar to the rule by the
Tresset [83]

The rulers of the Soviet Union viewed empire and imperialism in ideological terms as ‘the highest and final stage of capitalism’.1 By this Leninist definition, the Soviet Union did not identify itself as an empire, and instead, its leaders vehemently denounced imperialism that was carried out by its enemies and competitors: the capitalist states. Despite its own anguish over being identified as an empire, the Soviet Union indeed was one. While the meaning of ‘empire’ has shifted over time, for the purposes of this paper the definition of empire is in the sense of a great power, a polity, ruling over vast territories and people, leaving a significant impact on the history of world civilizations.2 As the characteristics of the Soviet Union are examined, support for viewing the USSR as an empire grows.

The Soviet Union emerged after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The Tsarist Russian Empire’s government was overthrown by the local soviets, led by the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks attempted to replace the Russian empire with a communist one, in which socialism would make nationalismobsolete and in place there would be a supra-national imperial ideology.3 Still, coming back to the issue of ‘empire’, the Soviet Union clearly maintained a commanding control over multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic societies that surpassed the extent of the preceding Imperial Russia Empire. A question thus arises: was the USSR a Russian empire? The first aspect to consider is if the USSR was a continuation of Russian imperialist power or if an intrinsic distinction can be made between the two. What is notable to address is what is meant by ‘Russian’ identity and nationality, its formation, and reshaping through time. Once this will be accounted for, this paper will move on with an answer to the question: the USSR was indeed an essentially different empire from the one preceding it, and thus, the USSR was not a Russian empire.


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A government with unlimited power
    12·2 answers
  • which of the following contributed to making the discovery of new lands and new trade routes desirable
    15·1 answer
  • Why was the Berlin Airlift successful in terms of the geography of Eastern Europe and East-West relations?
    5·1 answer
  • In which of the following regions has the United States been militarily involved, in the 1990s and into the early decades of the
    13·1 answer
  • Who sets the salary of the president?
    11·2 answers
  • What did the British find to export to India to pay for their tea?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a purpose of the propaganda campaign?
    13·2 answers
  • Which nation has no political parties, no voting rights for its citizens, and is ruled by a king?
    9·1 answer
  • Other than court of appeals,which court can send cases directly to the U.S supreme court?
    11·1 answer
  • What did the Soviet Union do in response to NATO?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!