Based on my knowledge, the scramble for Africa was largely because the industrial revolution was springing up all over the world in largely European countries and they were at a point where resources were running out. Gold and other valuable metals were discovered in Africa as well as timber. The surplus of resources in Africa made it very valuable to these industrial countries so they all made a huge "scramble" to Africa. Also, the idea of merchantilism, the idea that the amount of land a country owned defined its wealth, was still very popular so these countries wanted to make a huge land grab.
1. Kennedy agreed to end the crises because they sent him a long rambling letter searching for a way out of the crises. The basic proposition was that if the U.S made a none invasion pledge then the soviets would remove their military presence in Cuba. From the U.S point of view, this was perfect.
2. Khrushchev agreed to end the crises because he wanted to avoid nuclear war and both sides acknowledged the risk, so both men agreed to end the crises to prevent war in any way possible.
3. On a scale i think both sides ended up winning because it could’ve ended up in a big devastating war between both sides of Kennedy would’ve refused the letter. Therefore i think both men won on protecting themselves from mass destruction on their land.
It separated most of Latin America from Spain, and founded new countries in South and Central America, such as: Venezuela, Ecuador, Colombia, etc. <span />