I believe what you're looking for is economics, but I could be wrong.
Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy, which gave a single person total power over the government and exempted the king from all checks and balances. On the other side, Locke endorsed a more liberal strategy for creating states.
What do the John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories of the social contract have in common?
Both Locke and Hobbes saw the social compact as being crucial to the political stability of a state. But each of these ideas was based on a very different understanding of human nature.
Why was Locke's viewpoint so much different than Hobbes?
The natural rules revealed by Locke exist in the state of nature, in opposition to Hobbes. Additionally, they are regarded as fundamental aspects of human nature since they violate people's right to personal freedom. A state of conflict is not the same as a state of nature.
Learn more about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories: brainly.com/question/1596903
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u>Popular sovereignty</u>
Is the ideals which state that a society need to be run according to the will of the majority of the people rather than a small number of elites.
<u>Social contract</u>
An ideal which state that a society can only be run if the people and the government engaged in a social contract. The people agree to let themselves constricted under the control of government legislations. In return, the government must work to increase the well being of the people.
<u>Natural rights</u>
Natural rights are a set of universal rights that cannot be undone / violated by any legislations or government actions under any circumstances.
<u>Individual rights</u>
Individual rights are a set of rights that bestowed to the people through a specific legal system. This rights can come and go depending on who held the position within the government.
Answer:
Nuestros padres, amigos, maestros y los medios de comunicación contribuyen a moldear nuestras identidades.
