Answer:
y = -1/2x + 0
y = mx+b
Step-by-step explanation:
.25p + 5 = .50p + 2
-.25p = -3
-p = -12
p= 12 problems
Answer:
A.) TRUE
B.) TRUE
C.) FALSE
D.) FALSE
E.) FALSE
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that :
SMARTPHONE A:
RAM : 256 MB
ROM : 32 GB
CAMERA RESOLUTION : 8 MP
SMARTPHONE B:
RAM : 288 MB
ROM : 64 GB
CAMERA RESOLUTION : 4 MP
SMARTPHONE C:
RAM : 128 MB
ROM : 32 GB
CAMERA RESOLUTION : 5 MP
Determine the truth value of each of these propositions.
A) Smartphone B has the most RAM of these three smart- phones.
TRUE ; 288 > (256 and 128)
B) Smartphone C has more R O M o r a higher resolution camera than Smartphone B.
C ROM > B ROM = FALSE
C CAMERA RESOLUTION > B camera resolution = TRUE
FALSE or TRUE = TRUE
C.) Smartphone B has more RAM, more R OM, and a higher resolution camera than Smartphone A.
RAM = TRUE ; ROM = TRUE ; CAMERA RESOLUTION = FALSE
TRUE and TRUE and FALSE = FALSE
d) If Smartphone B has more RAM and more R O M than Smartphone C, then it also has a higher resolution camera.
CAMERA RESOLUTION ON SMARTPHONE B IS LESS, HENCE, STATEMENT = FALSE
e) Smartphone A has more RAM than Smartphone B i f and only if Smartphone B has more RAM than Smart- phone A.
1st statement = FALSE
2nd condition = TRUE
FALSE and TRUE
= FALSE
We can just divide 2x+14 by 2 to get the cost of one person, as the equation represents the total costs of two people.
So the equation is x+7, but it may be x+14 because you can’t split the pizza.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there exists significant difference in the birth weights of a mother's first child and second child at 10% level of significance.
Step-by-step explanation:
When our p-value exceeds level of significance then we fail to reject our null hypothesis. In this scenario we are investigating if there exists significant difference in the birth weights of a mother's first child and second child and our null hypothesis is there exists no significant difference in the birth weights of a mother's first child and second child i.e.μd=0.
As we are given that p-value is greater than 10% level of significant so, we cannot reject our null hypothesis. Thus, the conclusion statement can be written as "There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there exists significant difference in the birth weights of a mother's first child and second child at 10% level of significance."
