The person may want to remarry someone of the same religion, or maybe not remarry at all, as it may be against their religion. Hope I helped.
This question is missing the options. I've found them online. They are as follows:
Mr. Reed would be considered a/an _________ offender because he does have the funds necessary to hire an attorney on his own.
a. a problem
b. an indigent
c. a contract
d. an assigned
e. an at risk
Answer:
Mr. Reed would be considered a/an b. indigent offender because he does have the funds necessary to hire an attorney on his own.
Explanation:
An indigent can be defined as someone who does not have the means and resources to provide the basic necessities of life, such as food and clothing. Likewise, an indigent offender is someone who does not have sufficient income to afford an attorney. In such cases, the court appoints and pays for the lawyer to represent the offender. This is actually a quite common occurrence, sometimes reaching the number of 82% of court appointed lawyers for felony defendants.
Answer:
C. other problems in living.
Explanation:
Problems with marital, family, peer, work, school, or community relationships would be MOST similar to other problems in living.
Answer: It had a History of Protecting Slavery and Segregation – This is often cited as one of the main detriments of the system of federalism that we have in this country, that since slavery was a state issue, it was something that could not be removed on the national level.
It Allows for Inequalities Between Different States – For example, instead of education funding throughout the country being the same, since it is a state issue, some states will spend more, per capita, on education than other states, causing what could be considered a disparity. The same goes for other things, as well, such as taxes, health care programs, and welfare programs.
The Blockage of Nationalist Policies by States – States can fight against the existence of certain national laws by challenging them in court, or going out of their way to not enforce those national laws, or even deliberately obstructing enforcement of national laws.
Racing to the Bottom – One argument given is that states will compete with each other in an oppositional way, by reducing the amount of benefits they give to welfare recipients compared to, say, a neighboring state, motivating the undesirables to go to the neighboring state, thereby reducing their welfare costs even more. This reduction of state benefits to needy has been deemed the ‘race to the bottom.’
They made the majority of their money through agriculture.
