1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semenov [28]
3 years ago
12

Lines 60–71: Analyze these lines to determine how the author likely wants to portray the Hopewell culture. What textual evidence

supports your analysis?
English
1 answer:
Sergeeva-Olga [200]3 years ago
8 0

Answer

Charles C. Mann portrays the Hopewell Culture as a beacon of civilization in North America.

They were prominent and proficient in the areas of earthworks, agriculture, and societal engineering.  

According to him, they ingrained their dominance by religion rather than warfare. Mann portrays the Hopewell Culture was a kingdom of the mind. Because even after the decline of Hopewell, its impacts in and trade and agriculture remained.

See textual evidence below:

"Hopewell itself declined around 400 A.D. But its trade network remained intact."

Cheers

You might be interested in
Based on the text evidence, which statement best reflects the contrast between Wang Lung's
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

the answer would be C. Wang Lung thinks that the men from the city are soft, but they are convinced that

peasants can be easily fooled.

Explanation::)

8 0
3 years ago
IS THIS AN EXAMPLE OF INTERNAL CONFLICT? I was about to risk everything on the throw of die; and if I failed, O what would becom
notka56 [123]
Yes, this is an internal conflict.

Internal Conflict:
1. mental struggle arising from opposingdemands or impulses.


2. psychological struggle within the mind of aliterary or dramatic character, the resolutionof which creates the plot's suspense:Hamlet's inaction is caused by internalconflict.

3 0
2 years ago
IT CAN BE ABT ANYTHING- PLS HELP. Look back through your research outline. You should have answered your research question. Ther
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

There have been a lot of complaints recently about our school's "no snacking in class" policy. Some students seem to believe they should be free to munch on whatever they like, whenever they choose. I admit there are some valid arguments for allowing food and drinks in the classroom. Overall, though, I think the principal's decision to uphold the snacking ban is a wise one.

Food in the classroom could actually create a lot of noise. It is easy to say that one person eating a crunchy food like potato chips does not make that much noise, but what happens when there are twenty people crunching, crinkling bags, ripping open packages, and gulping down juice? I think it could easily make it more difficult to hear what the teacher is saying. All of these sounds would be a nightmare for me, because I find it difficult to focus on my work when there is a lot of background noise.

Students may say they will clean up after themselves, but I think we all know that letting food and drinks into the classroom would create a huge mess. No matter how careful students are, there are bound to be spills and crumbs. Just imagine how it would feel to arrive at your desk only to find the seat is sticky and the desktop is littered with cracker fragments.

Next, there is the issue of what students will be snacking on. Some students would make healthy choices. They might pack apple slices or carrot sticks with dip. They would choose to drink water or milk; however, there are many others who would decide to drink soda or eat chips and candy bars. Unhealthy snacks do not have much nutritional value at all. They are full of empty calories, and eating too many of them can lead to health problems. The school would probably want to discourage students from eating garbage. This gives teachers yet another responsibility. Instead of making them the "snack police," it is easier to just keep food out of the classroom.

Allowing snacking in the classroom is not just noisy and messy. For some students, it could also be dangerous. Some students at our school are allergic to certain foods. If they are exposed to them, there could be serious consequences. They might feel sick to their stomach or get itchy. If they are extremely allergic to the food, they might even have trouble breathing and need to go to the hospital. The scary thing is, it may not take very much of a food to trigger an allergic reaction. Keeping all foods and drinks out of the classroom will help keep students with food allergies safe. There is no doubt that all snacks are not created equal. A vitamin–packed banana is clearly more nutritious than a sugar–filled bag of banana–flavored candy. Some may view the fact that students might make unhealthy choices as a reason to keep snacks out of class. Letting snacks in class provides teachers with a superb chance to educate students about making good food choices. They can talk to the class as a whole or to single students about the difference between good snacks and bad snacks. They might even choose to ban junk food outright. These lessons could stay with and help students throughout their lives.Some people worry about the potential noise and mess that will result if food and drinks are allowed into the classroom. They also worry about food allergies. The benefits of allowing food into the classroom outweigh these downsides, though. In addition, these possible problems could be fully avoided by creating some rules students need to follow and introducing some new classroom routines. For instance, students might be told they cannot bring "noisy foods" into the classroom. Teachers could post a list of foods that are banned because some students are allergic to them. Teachers could also give students just a couple of minutes close to the end of class to throw away empty wrappers and wipe up spills.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Can you please help me
Mars2501 [29]
Ive read someone do a summary on this have u tried looking it up somewhere else?
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Allie considered it carefully, and ______ decided to train for the marathon herself. Which type of pronoun would best complete t
g100num [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

The correct answer is B. subjective.

In order to complete this sentence, you need to use a subjective pronoun. That pronoun would be SHE, as in - '... she decided to train for the marathon herself.' An objective pronoun would be HER, which is obviously incorrect. An intensive and a reflexive pronouns look the same - HERSELF. As a matter of fact, there is an intensive pronoun in the sentence above - the last word.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!!!I NEED IT DONE FOR TOMORROW'S HOMEWORK
    11·1 answer
  • I will give brainliest !!!!
    14·1 answer
  • 1
    6·2 answers
  • What is the appositive phrase in this sentence? Ms. Gray, a local wildlife observer, gives lectures at elementary schools. A. gi
    10·2 answers
  • Which word does not include the idea of sound?
    6·1 answer
  • Why does ender's family move to north Carolina ​
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone write an ode about music for me pls 10 lines ???
    13·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRANLIEST PLS FAST
    10·1 answer
  • What do you like to eat when you eat out? Please give an example.
    5·2 answers
  • What is the main purpose of a dictionary entry?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!