Answer:
why does andrew jackson justify the native American policy
(Ignore This Fam) I'm just answering so I can ask questions.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) was a French anthropologist, sociologist, and social scientist. According to him, social change normally takes place gradually, slowly. He observed that, when social change happens rapidly, it causes strain and breakdown. That leads to an increase in anomie, which is a sense of futility due to the sensation that social norms are weak, absent, or even conflicting.
Answer:
<h3>4. all of the above.</h3>
Explanation:
The concept of utilitarianism simply asserts that actions are determined, whether they are good or bad, by the results it brings. It takes into account only the results of an action. The purpose of this concept is to make a society better by maximizing the amount of good things while reducing the amount of bad things.
Utilitarians rejects moral conducts and systems controlled by a board of higher authority. And does not belief in the orders and rules which are constructed on the lines of customs, traditions, or other supernatural elements.
Here, the reasons to reject utilitarianism includes all the given reasons. Utilitarianism believes that actions done by an individual for his own pleasure is a basic fundamental reasoning. It does not take into account the greater pleasure of the people.
Utilitarianism advocates individual's interest and ignores the interests of other people focusing only on one's egoistic self interest in their quests for the greatest pleasure.
Utilitarians believe that humans are capable of distinguishing good and bad by nature. Therefore, every action done by him/her is for the purposes of achieving the greatest pleasure.
Supreme Court has the power to review and make final decisions about the outcomes of trials of other instances. Specifically it's the one institution that has the power to interpret the Constitution. Because of this I believe that the best answer is the last one: Supreme Court is responsible for cases which involve interpretations of the Constitution.
