The answer is Presidential veto. hope this helps!
The answer to the question is D.
Rail connections to the Great Plains proved especially devastating. After acquiring horses, Indians there had become heavily dependent on the plains bison for food, shelter, clothing, trade, and much more. In 1872 it was found that bison hides could be processed into commercial leather, and white hide-hunters immediately set out to meet that demand. Within a decade they had driven the millions of animals to the verge of extinction. The slaughter would have been unlikely, probably impossible, had railroads not provided the means to ship the hides and bones off to eastern factories. In one year near the end of the carnage, 1881–1882, the Northern Pacific shipped 2,250 tons of hides from the northern plains. Once the herds were gone, plains Indians had no true option but to turn to reservations and dependence on federal support. In effect the life blood of a people had bled away through the rail lines.
Answer:
Creoles had the most to gain, they were upset and they didn't have equal power with the true Spaniards.
Explanation:
The Creoles suffered a lot and they faced a lot of challenges during the period. As a result, they were determined and focused. They would gain a lot from leading the revolution. Although they did not have enough [powers as the Spaniards yet they were determined. With their determination and anger, they led the revolution to have the power they needed.
Dog I am doing ok thank you for your and my love and you please help you with the help I love doing it I hope you have to your help I hope you have to have fun today hope your not ok I love it I hope you have to have fun love love it love love bye love love it love love bye love love it love love bye love you
Answer:
An affirmative defense of <u><em>Duress</em></u> implies an accused committed a criminal act in response to another’s volition (or will). Put simply, the defendant argues that someone made them commit the crime.
Explanation:
A duress can be described as a kind of affirmative defense. In this type of defense, the lawyer or attorney can argue that a defendant did something illegal due to extraordinary situations like somebody threatening them to do the illegal act. The attorney fights that in such a scenario, the defendant should not be held accountable for the act. Duress is a defense which can be used to justify an illegal act as the evidence shows that the culprit has caused the illegal act.
