Need some help with proofs with transformations picture included

Suppose that a number written as a decimal has an infinite number of non-repeating digits after the decimal point. What is this

emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

Irrational

Step-by-step explanation:

The number is called an irrational number.

These numbers have some distinct properties. The number of numbers after the decimal point is infinite. What this means is that it does not terminate. It keeps on repeating.

Also, these numbers cannot be represented as a ratio of two integers i.e two whole numbers. This is because they keep on going without termination.

Lastly is that these numbers do not repeat after decimal. What I mean by this is that they do not keep repeating a particular number after the decimal point. For example in cases like 2.33333; these are infinite too, but they can be represented by the ratio of two whole numbers and in such cases, they are not irrational in their own respect

8 0

3 years ago

A girl is snorkeling 1 meter below sea level and then dives down another 4.5 meters. How far below sea level is the girl?

san4es73 [151]

Answer:

5.5 Meters below sea level

Step-by-step explanation:

Since sea level is at 0 meters, the girl is already 1 meter below sea level. When she dives down another 4.5 meters, you just add

1 + 4.5 = 5.5

and that's your answer

:)

4 0

3 years ago

The test statistic of zequals2.32 is obtained when testing the claim that pgreater than0.3. a. Identify the hypothesis test as b

Sonja [21]

Answer:

a) We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion p is greatr than 0.3, so then the system of hypothesis are.:

Null hypothesis: $p \leq 0.3$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.3$

Right tailed test

b) $p_v =P(z>2.32)=0.0102$

c) So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.1$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of interest is higher than 0.3

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a: Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion p is greatr than 0.3, so then the system of hypothesis are.:

Null hypothesis: $p \leq 0.3$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.3$

Right tailed test

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

Calculate the statistic

For this case the statistic is given by $z_{calc}= 2.32$

Part b: Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(z>2.32)=0.0102$

Part c

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.1$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of interest is higher than 0.3

6 0

3 years ago

Evaluate tan(cos^-1(-15/17))

IrinaK [193]

The answer is -8/15. This is a for sure correct answer.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Felicia drew a triangle with side lengths that measured 15 cm, 18 cm and 27 cm. To determine if Felicia drew a right triangle, s

Charra [1.4K]

Answer:

The equation should be h²=P²+b²

27²=15²+18²

729=225+324

729=549

thus, it is not right angle triangle

3 0

3 years ago