Answer:
Rodney should win the case because he showed up to do the work but Yolanda failed to perform her part of the contract (provide the paint).
The legal term used to describe Rodney's offer of performance is tender or attempted performance. In this case, Rodney (the promisor) went to Yolanda's house and offered to perform his painting services. Yolanda (the promisee) did not perform her part of the contract by not providing the paint, so the promisor was unable to perform. Since Rodney's non-performance was directly caused by Yolanda's non-performance, he is not liable for anything since Yolanda lost her rights because she breached the contract first.
The correct answer is; An employer might be liable for the actions of its employees outside the scope of employment if the employer was negligent or reckless in allowing it to occur, or for other reasons.
Further Explanation:
One way that an employer can be liable for the actions outside of work and can be considered negligent outside of work is if the employee is still clocked in at work. For example, if the employee is on a break and clocked in and hits and runs a car and someone gets hurt, the employer can be liable.
To be classified as an employee there are a few things that must be done by the employer such as;
- Withhold income tax
- Pay employers share of social security tax
- Pay employers share of Medicare taxes
- Provide unemployment insurance for all employees
Learn more about employee rights at brainly.com/question/7890057
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
kung may roon Kang confident na kaya mo sarili
Answer: C
Explanation: This answer displays no evidence that the defendant was under the influence of anything
Because they all give you a right to act on
