Answer: In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution requires the states to provide defense attorneys to criminal defendants charged with serious offenses who cannot afford lawyers themselves. The case began with the 1961 arrest of Clarence Earl Gideon.
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe the Preliminary hearing is the answer.
Explanation:
-Grand jury- has nothing to do with this part. Their job is to look at the evidence once the judge determines that the case can go to trial.
- Arraignment- is when the defendant is read what charges they are going to brought upon.
-Detention hearing- the judge decides whether or not the person should be Detained.
Answer:
if yes, i would say a cold soup maybe lol and can i have brainliest pls thanks?
Explanation:
Answer: The best criticizism is that Bar exams "cost too much and exact great liabilities" Option A is the most correct option
Explanation: Bar exams are used to regulate the number of people that are practical layers. This exam is taken after you've successfully graduated from a law school.
The exam has been designed to favor only the rich, as the poor finds it very difficult to pay the fees involved. The law school is very costly, as the books and course handout are always costly. The exam is too costly that you need a loan that should not be less that $140,000 to complete your studies, leading to big liability to pay off, when you have started practicing. Even when you have passed the exams, you are still meant to pay for your license.
The government should try and subsidize the amount of money been paid for Bar exam, as this will help to increase the boundaries of licensing outstanding layers, thereby creating an equal opportunity chance for the rich and the poor to practice law.
