Answer: 1. Polytheistic 2. Persian empire 3. Heaven and hell
Explanation:
Just trust
Hamilton's argument was based on the "necessary and proper" clause of Article I, Section 8, of the United States Constitution.
After enumerating a number of the powers of Congress, including borrowing money, coining money, regulating commerce, etc, Section 8 of Article I closes with by saying Congress shall have power "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
Hamilton favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution -- in other words, that the Constitution allows for anything that is not strictly forbidden in what it has expressly stated. A national bank was not strictly listed as something Congress could establish, but there was nothing in the Constitution to prohibit it. And the "necessary and proper" clause gave leeway to create it.
The 1860 presidential election
states’ rights
I would say that B was the case ie Bush's prediction that Iraq's defeat would be quick and cheap was wrong. I believe that the US under Bush had no right to invade Iraq which was a sovereign country definitely with no weapons of mass destruction and its people had a high standard of living and women were much more emanicipated than in many other Arab countries like Saudi Arabia which the US is a staunch ally of. Also, it was gross hypocrisy when before the US had been an ally of Saddam Hussein during the war between Iraq and Iran and supplied him with arms.