Fundamental reason for this was Russia’s under-developed economy, which was mostly agricultural – in fact until the mid-1800s it was almost entirely agrarian, with only minimal manufacturing or industry. <span> Government incentives of the late 1800s instigated a sharp increase in industrial investment and manufacturing; French investors, attracted by government deals, cheap labour and tax breaks, had eagerly pumped money into Russia to construct factories and new mines. But even with this, Russia still tailed its western European neighbours by a long stretch.</span>
They are happy because the huns were good people so they were not worried about being force to doing cetrain things
I’d say last option for trade opportunities
One important advantage that primary soruces have over secondary sources is that primary sources offer a firsthand account of an event - b, which isn't the case with secondary sources. Although this leaves primary sources prone to being biased compared to secondary sources.
A new strategy used against Hitler in which he Western democracies would give into the demands of an aggressor in order to keep the peace.
British - no desire to fight anyone
France - demoralized and had political division
-quizlet
