2. Summary: a man was going to Jerusalem and was attacked, robbed of his items, and beaten. A priest, a Levite, and a Samaritan man all came by one by one. The priest and Levite didn’t help but the Samaritan (who Jews didn’t like at all) helped him.
Moral: don’t judge someone because of where they are from. God uses many people to help us and works in mysterious ways.
4. The resurrection is important because without Christ’s resurrection our faith is futile as Saint Paul says. But also because it shows that Jesus was who He said He is: God in the flesh. By conquering death he fulfilled the Old Testament prophecies and conquered sin and that Satan has no power over us anymore. This is why it is so important.
Answer: Social exchange theory
Explanation:
Social exchange theory is defined as the concept that determines social attitude and acts are produced due to exchange mechanism.It consist of cost and benefit as negative and positive consequence respectively for social behavior.This theory depicts about increasing benefits in terms of money,energy etc and reducing cost.
According to the question, social exchange theory will be the concept for perspective of Chen in divorce scenario .He will be specifying Anne's behavior of spending money in speedy manner as negative aspect that is leading to maximize cost rather than benefit .This can lead to risk of social relationship and their own marriage.
Thus, divorce claim by Chen is based upon cost maximization of social exchange theory that is bothering him as Anne is spending rapidly due to her family background.
During a Solar Eclipse and the other thing is the Corona, the Corona is Latin for crown and is the shining white part that you see around the moon during a Solar Eclipse
The answer is the Right-to-life movement. The concept of the right to life states that every living being has the right to exist and, more specifically single, shouldn't be put to death by another being.
The concept of a right to life is brought up in conversations about a variety of topics, including the death penalty, which some people think is immoral, abortion, where some people think a foetus is alive and should not be terminated prematurely, euthanasia, where some people believe it is wrong to choose to end one's life without using the natural single means, and the police shootings.
To learn more about right to life, click here.
brainly.com/question/22310239
#SPJ4
Despite wide recognition that speculation is critical for successful science, philosophers have attended little to it. When they have, speculation has been characterized in narrowly epistemic terms: a hypothesis is speculative due to its (lack of) evidential support. These ‘evidence-first’ accounts provide little guidance for what makes speculation productive or egregious, nor how to foster the former while avoiding the latter. I examine how scientists discuss speculation and identify various functions speculations play. On this basis, I develop a ‘function-first’ account of speculation. This analysis grounds a richer discussion of when speculation is egregious and when it is productive, based in both fine-grained analysis of the speculation’s purpose, and what I call the ‘epistemic situation’ scientists face.
