Answer:
Constantinople was an easy target for Mehmed II because Byzantine forces were small in comparison with Ottoman's forces.
Explanation:
The fall of Constantinople was a turning point for Roman empire as it marked the end of Middle ages and heralded the flag of Renaissance. The Byzantine empire was the pillar of the eastern Roman empire and with the fall of Byzantine empire, Roman empire fall down.
On May 29, 1453, Ottomon empire defeated the Byzantine empire. According to historians, Constantinople was an easy target for Mehmed II because the army or forces were small of Byzantine empire in comparison with the Ottomon empire. This difference in the number of forces made the fall of Constantinople easy.
The answer is the following one:
feasibility study
Explanation:
Dharma conducts a feasibility study because she has to assess the practicality of her plan to decide whether she should go forward with her business or not. The plan includes many aspects of a business like the market, the owner´s financial position, taxes, etc. These are all the relevant factors to analyze before deciding to complete a project.
<span>Good Morning!
For life in the suburbs it was essential that one could get to work as quickly as possible. Thus, the installation of </span>the Interstate Highway Act was a fundamental step for the growth of such sites.
Answer:
Spontaneous recovery
Explanation:
Mia is taught to go to sleep when the light is turned off. However, for many months Mia no longer falls asleep when the light is turned off. Later, Mia begins to fall asleep when the light is turned off again. This is an example of <u>spontaneous recovery</u>.
Spontaneous recovery refers to <em>a phenomenon in which a person exhibits a behavior that was thought to have disappeared</em>, that is, a specific behavior reappears after a 'rest' period.
The study of spontaneous recovery has been extremely significant in the field of psychology because it has shown that some behaviors do not disappear but, instead, it is only not displayed. This has demonstrated the important difference between extinction and unlearning.
I believe the answer is Cogent.
To be considered as cogent, an argument must be based on true premise and backed with relevant and accurate data.
On top of that, the argument must be framed in such a way that make it believable in the perspective of the listener.<span />
