Answer:They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations.The United States' use of nuclear weapons to end World War II led to a determined and soon successful effort by the Soviet Union to acquire such weapons, followed by a long-running nuclear arms race between the two superpowers. The Soviet Union conducted its first nuclear test in 1949.In 1949, the USSR tested its first atomic bomb. This led to a race between the two superpowers to amass the most powerful nuclear weapons with the most effective delivery systems. ... Tension was greatly increased as a result of the developing arms race which served to militarise both sides and bring war closer.
Explanation:
(happy to help)
All of the mentioned people are a part of ancient Greece
Leonidas- He was the king of Sparta, a city located in ancient Greece
Philip of Macedon- He was the king of Macedon (ancient Greece) who has its origin from the Argead dynasty
Alexander the Great- Also known as Alexander III he is a popular king known for his conquests around the world.
Cleisthenes- He is a Greek lawmaker who is known for creating the constitution of ancient Greece
Solon- A Greek lawmaker who is known for laying the foundation stone for Greek democracy
Demosthenes- An orator from ancient Greece. He is also known for his statesmanship
In Zwingli's theory, church and state are one under the sovereign government of God, from his point of view, as the government was ordained by God Christians are obliged to obey, regardless of whether the government is good or bad because of both came from God.
On the other hand, Calvin appreciated the advantages of democracy, he suggested separating the state among different institutions in a system of checks and balances in order to reduce the misuse of political power.
Answer: A. The Cherokees won the right to stay on their land and were deemed an independent nation.
<em>(That was a hollow victory though -- see last paragraph of explanation below.)</em>
<em />
Explanation:
The 1832 case, Worcester v. Georgia, ruled unconstitutional a Georgia law requiring non-Native Americans requiring a license from the state to be on Native American land. In responding to the case, the Supreme Court asserted that the federal government is the sole authority to deal with a Native American nation. From this Supreme Court assertion came the beginnings of tribal sovereignty within the United States for Native American nations -- that the US government would deal with them as domestic nations inside the United States.
The court case was named after Samuel Worcester, a Christian minister working among the Cherokee who was supportive of the Cherokee cause. To block the activity of a man like Rev. Worcester, the state of Georgia passed a law prohibiting white persons to live within the Cherokee Nation territory without permission from the Georgia state government. Worcester and other missionaries challenged this law, and the case rose to the level of a Supreme Court decision. The decision by the Supreme Court, written by Chief Justice Marshall, struck down the Georgia law and reprimanded Georgia for interfering in the affairs of the Cherokee Nation. Marshall wrote that Indian nations are "distinct, independent political communities retaining their original natural rights."
But President Andrew Jackson chose not to enforce the court's decision. He said at the time: "The decision of the Supreme Court has fell stillborn, and they find that it cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate." He told the Cherokee that they would need to operate under the jurisdiction of the state of Georgia or else relocate. This was a step in the direction of what became known as the "Trail of Tears," when the Cherokee were removed from Georgia and moved to territory in Oklahoma.
True, Nixon's foreign policy was heavily criticized.<span />
