Answer:
c and b
Explanation:
The following lines from Frost's "The Road Not Taken" indicate what about the Speaker? Line 2: And sorry I could not travel both Line 3: And be one traveler long I stood A. The spaaker is waiting for someone TOT a long time ("long I stood"). B The speaker is traveling by himself- just "one traveler." C. The speaker is sorry he can't travel both roads
Answer:
Correct answer is They were weak and sometimes dishonest.
Explanation:
First option is correct as the Roman Empire, especially western part was very unstable. That was additionally upheld by the fact that most of them since the division of Empire in 395 had no authority and brought many wrong decision.
Second option is not correct as we cannot say that they were popular at all.
Third option is not correct, as one of the ways how we were able to see their incompetence was through the fact that they practically made no reform.
Last option is also not correct as people weren't directly choosing them.
Because bias stances may (and most likely do) effect people's out look on a topic
Answer:
<u><em>C : The Government. </em></u>
Explanation:
In a command economy, <u>the government </u>controls major aspects of economic production. The government decides the means of production and owns the industries that produce goods and services for the public. The government prices and produces goods and services that it thinks benefits the people.
Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
