Are the punishments under Hammurabi's Code harsh or lenient? Use some examples to support your

History

1 answer:

artcher [175]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

It was harsh but sometimes fair. Their system of laws dictated precise retribution, "or "an eye for an eye" for lesser crimes. If you do someone wrong, expect the same to be done to you. If you broke someones bone, you would have YOUR bone broken. However for capital crimes, there were bizarre and gruesome punishments. If 2 people were seen committing incest, they were burned alive. If a boy hit his father, his hands would be chopped off. So yes they were pretty harsh but sometimes it was okay.

You might be interested in

In one paragraph, compare and contrast the similarities and differences found in the two accounts, and explain which account is

shtirl [24]

Both accounts mention those who tried to take refuge in the Tower of David, but Fulcher claims all

3 0

2 years ago

Which conflicts are examples of external conflicts? Select three options.

Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

Email being hacked, the law, and Enzo and Luca

Explanation:

it is because external conflicts is a conflict going on outside someone's body/mind.

7 0

3 years ago

What did frontier farmers and urban artisans hope the Constitution would do?

ICE Princess25 [194]

Wait for the farmers to finish work before fight practice

5 0

3 years ago

The Southern colonies’ rich soil and warm climate made them good for growing crops. As a result, the Southern economy was almost

mihalych1998 [28]

Need to kno this too

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Gonzales v. CARHART explained please

Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

Gonzales v. Carhart, was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. The case reached the high court after U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales appealed a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in favor of LeRoy Carhart that struck down the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Also before the Supreme Court was the consolidated appeal of Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which had struck down the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago