<span>A parliamentary democracy does not have an individual executive but a presidential democracy does.
</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is: Behavioral.
Explanation:
In psychology, the behavioral perspective is one of the main theoretical approaches to human behavior that states that for psychology to be considered science the main focus of study has to be observable behavior and the relationship between stimulus and conduct.
In this particular case, the statement reads:
Group therapy is a good option for those with dependent personality disorder; they'll be able to observe others' coping skills and model them.
In that statement, the focus is the observable behavior (Coping skills) and the observer response (model the behaviors).
This is one of the main concepts of Albert Bandura which was also a behavioral psychologist.
In conclusion, this statement would MOST likely be made by a therapist having the Behavioral theoretical perspective.
Answer:
Runoff can be described as the part of the water cycle that flows over land as surface water instead of being absorbed into groundwater or evaporating. Runoff is that part of the precipitation, snow melt, or irrigation water that appears in uncontrolled surface streams, rivers, drains, or sewers.
Explanation:
It is a false statement that civil <span>disobedience is the idea that citizens should overthrow their government with violent means when the government does not represent them. The correct option among the two options that are given in the question is the second option. I hope the answer has helped you.</span>
Answer:
If isolationism has become outdated, what kind of foreign policy does the United States follow? In the years after World War II, the United States was guided generally by containment — the policy of keeping communism from spreading beyond the countries already under its influence. The policy applied to a world divided by the Cold War, a struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union.
With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, containment no longer made sense, so in the past ten years, the United States has been redefining its foreign policy. What are its responsibilities, if any, to the rest of the world, now that it has no incentive of luring them to the American "side" in the Cold War? Do the United States still need allies? What action should be taken, if any, when a "hot spot" erupts, causing misery to the people who live in the nations involved? The answers are not easy.
mark me brainliest plz :)
