Luther's ideas lead him to break with the church and to a new faith. Martin Luther did not agree with some of the practices and teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, for example, he rejected "indulgence", which was a practice used by the Roman Catholic Church to reduce the punishment one was supposed to undergo for sins. He wrote his Ninety five Theses of 1517, where he discussed this practice. Pope Leo X asked him to renounce to all of his writings but he refused, he was excommunicated by the Pope and condemned by the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. Luther believed that the only source of divine knowledge from God is the Bible, he thought that the bible should be translated from Latin vernacular languages so that it could be understood by everybody. He translated the Bible to German. All of his ideas were rejected and prohibited by the church. His beliefs led him to break with the church and start what he called the Christian or Evangelical faith, now called Lutheranism.
I can't really answer this for you because this is YOUR opinion but here's what I would've said; Yes, I would have because of the extreme hardships the militia men had to go through. During that winter, many soldiers had suffered the consequences of going through and not quitting the journey but if I were one of them, I would've quit. Even though I know that I have to fight for the country, I would not have been able to go through with the lasting consequences. Men had to walk through treacherous snow which also was cold and wet, this was not a good environment for soldiers to be in.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to choose the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The three specific arguments in favor of why this Amendment is necessary in a democratic society are the following.
1.- One of the most important characteristics of modern democratic societies is that citizens are free. Without freedom, there is no democracy.
2.- People have their own set of belief systems and they will always have them. It is intrinsic to human nature. No matter what religion people profess, it is their right.
3.- The right to assemble in a peaceful way to exchange ideas, no matter what kind of ideas, it's part of any democratic government and society in the world.
The two arguments against why this Amendment may no longer be necessary in today's America.
1.- It is so implicit that citizens have rights that will come a day in which this value of liberty would have no need to be part of a Bill of Rights.
2.- Science and the use of logic could be a substitute for the ingraining belief that people need religion to have something to believe in. When science could be able to explain it all through the use of reason, maybe there won't be the necessity to include freedom of religion as part of the Bill of Rights.
Answer:the eight members of the clergy who wrote “call for unity” supported the civil rights movement. They believed in the idea of equality for all Americans. However they thought that equal rights should be pursued only through the courts and legal methods. Martian Luther King Jr. and other civil rights activists believed that it was necessary to hold demonstrations, such as sit-ins and marches, to put pressure on governments and call attention to issues. Even though these methods were technically against the law, activists argued that these laws were immoral. Their tactics helped bring about important change
Explanation:
Sample answer from edmentum yw!
