Answer: (1) Equilibrium price = 60 and Equilibrium quantity = 120, when I = $1500.
(2) Equilibrium price = 54 and Equilibrium quantity = 108, when I = $1200.
Explanation:
(1) When Average income (I) = $1500
At equilibrium, QD = QS
150 - 3p + 0.1I = 2p
150 - 3p + 0.1 × 1500 = 2p
5p = 300
p = data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78a89/78a89b9c8c556d5097ef23f4f56385a6b5233d0a" alt="\frac{300}{5}"
p = 60
q = 2p ⇒ 2 × 60 = 120
Hence, p and q are equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity, respectively.
(2) If 20% income tax is introduced then Average income (I) = $1500 - 20% of $1500 ⇒ $1500 - $300 = $1200
At equilibrium, QD = QS
150 - 3p + 0.1I = 2p
150 - 3p + 0.1 × 1200 = 2p
5p = 270
p = data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2aaa6/2aaa6e498f9f457aac6e5fb07ac1adf382d65b85" alt="\frac{270}{5}"
p = 54
q = 2p ⇒ 2 × 54 = 108
Hence, p and q are equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity, respectively.
The effective annual rate is 8.33%.
we can calculate the effective nominal annual rate by using this formula;
r = e∧i - 1
e is the constant = 2.718
i = compounded annual nominal rate = 8% = 0.08
r = 2.718∧ (0.08) - 1
= 1.0833 - 1
= 0.0833 = 0.0833 x 100 = 8.33%
Oona should conduct research in the area of <u>"industrial-organizational" </u>psychology.
Industrial-organizational psychology is the branch of psychology that applies psychological speculations and standards to associations. Regularly alluded to as I-O brain research, this field centers around expanding working environment profitability and related issues, for example, the physical and mental prosperity of representatives.
Industrial-organizational psychologists use psychological standards and research strategies to take care of issues in the work environment and enhance the personal satisfaction. They think about work environment profitability and administration and representative working styles. They figure out the morale and identity of an organization or association.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
In the above scenario, Diane's decision to gather preference information for the product features is an example of her Determining Research Objectives. Thus option D is the right option.
Cheers
Realistic conflict theory would be a good explanation for rising prejudice in this situation.
<h3>What do you mean by
Realistic conflict theory ?</h3>
According to the realistic conflict theory, wherever there are two or more groups vying for the same few resources, there will be conflict, false preconceptions and ideas, and prejudice towards the various groups.
Just the perception of competition will foster hostile emotions and discriminating behavior in one group. For instance, whether or not it is accurate, ethnic group A will feel resentment and hatred if it perceives that members of ethnic group B are a threat to them by "taking employment."
Learn more about realistic conflict theory here
brainly.com/question/4511475
#SPJ1