An anchoring bias occurs when you focus on <span>one piece of information versus all of the information
For example, you never met mr. Kirk your close friend told you that Mr.Kirk is a liar that should not be tasted (even though your friend offer no proof).
When you met Mr.Kirk personally, you will have a basic assumption that Mr.Kirk is a liar no matter what other qualities that he may conveyed</span>
Answer:
yes I agree with this statement. in the olden days they used to be female circumcision, boys were seen more important than girls. I believe in some countries or some tribes these fgm is stopped, boys and girls are seen equal. girls don't have that severe punishment they used to have in the past so I agree that we have a long way to go with regards to women's rights and gender equality worldwide.
Answer:
I would say A, but only because it seems like the most logical answer. Morally, I would say C because she would want to be independent, so choose A.
Explanation:
Answer: The real answer is-a petition by two-thirds (34 of the 50) of the states
Explanation:i did the test, so i know what im talking about.
Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
