The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B. He helped negotiate peace <span>agreements between Israeli and PLO leaders. C. He helped bring about a stock-market surge, low unemployment, minimal inflation, and general prosperity. D. He supported a welfare reform billed that increased the number of people receiving welfare."</span>
Answer:
I think the answer is B, D, E.
May I have brainlest
The correct answer is answer 4 ("It stopped all aggression on both sides").
The Treaty of Ghent ended the War of 1812 between Great Britain and the United States. After both sides signed it, the borders of the two nations were restored to the lines that standed before the conflict had started, and it marked the beginning of over two centuries of peace between them.
It was signed during the Battle of New Orleans, <u>not after</u>. The news took about a month to reach the places in combat, but <u>peace had already been signed before the US won that battle</u>.
<u>Native American hostilities continued for many years to come.</u>
After the war ended and the treaty was signed, <u>the United Kingdom still retained many north american territories that were under their domain before.</u>
Hope this helps!
Answer:
C Inadmissible, because it is extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement on a collateral matter.
Explanation:
A defendant is on trial for robbing a liquor store. The store clerk testified that the defendant came into the store at about 11 p.m., pointed a black gun with a silver grip at him, and demanded that he give him all the money in the cash register. The clerk testified that the store was well lit and that the defendant was not wearing a mask. The defendant's attorney called the clerk's employer to testify that when the clerk gave her a report of the robbery, he told her that the defendant pointed a silver gun with a black grip at him.
How should the trial judge rule on the admissibility of this testimony?
The evidence should not be accepted by the Judge. if the the earlier statement is contrary, it is not a enough to dismiss the witness.(A) and (B) are incorrect because, The clerk may be reliable or not. The evidence she provided is not enough to prosecute the defendant. she might not be totally correct in the reporting of the situation and might leave the judge confused. (D) is not correct
