Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
The First inaugural address was delivered on Monday, March 4, 1861, as part of his taking of the oath of office for his first term as the President of the United States in which he was asking for the preservation of the Union during a perilous time, he called for compromise from both his supporter in the NORTH and without further alienating the South but making his point known (“<em>In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war</em>)He likewise declared secession to be wrong ;promised not to interfere with the institution of slavery where it existed.
However,Abraham Lincoln has a dispassionate for slavery,rejecting the South's defense of slavery; this stand eventually lead to the outbreak of the American Civil War.
At the time of Lincoln’s second inaugural address, the civil war is also most coming to an end and the Union’s victory over the South was imminent. Because of this the second speech was based on resolution,also reaffirming a faith in God's will and healing a once-divided nation
Answer:
3. 0
Explanation:
In both instances of the election, Lincoln won with just the support of the North. In many cases, Lincoln did not even appear as a choice due to being a free-lander, later abolitionist, and was not able to get many votes from the South. However, it is important to note that the North had more electorate votes per state as there were more people living in Northern states, thereby giving Lincoln the edge.
~
Answer:
Women did not have the right to vote
:)
The correct answer is C. The bias of historians will affect the way they record events
Explanation:
History is considered as the study of events especially events related to human beings and mainly described using written documents, as the study of the past before written documents existed is called prehistory. These events are usually recorded, collected and interpreted by historians, however it is questioned whether historians are objective, this means they record the events in the way they occurred or whether they are guided by bias, which means historians might focus on specific events and let other out or let their values, perspectives and beliefs influence on their job. Thus, historians can affect history negatively if they are not objective but let bias affect the way they record events.
