Sorry you couldn’t get your answer
Answer:
The option that best characterizes the contradiction that the author refers to is:
E. While traveling alone in the nineteenth-century was considered a radical act for a woman, the nineteenth-century solitary female travelers generally held conventional views.
Explanation:
<em>[...] solitary travelers espoused traditional values, eschewing radicalism and women’s movements. [...] the female travelers seemed content to leave society as it was while accomplishing their own liberation. In other words, they lived a contradiction.</em>
The lines above have what we need to answer this question. <u>The contradiction referred to in the passage concerns the female travelers of the 19th century. Even though those women were doing something considered astonishing back then - women were not supposed to travel on their own -, they were not breaking boundaries and taboos as they could have been. They were conventional in their general views, not worrying about society remaining the way it was. As long as they were free to do what they wanted, they did not feel the need to fight so that other women could do what they wanted as well. Thus, being revolutionary and, at the same time, conventional was their contradiction.</u>
The correct answer is A. There was no reign of terror associated with the American Revolution.<span />
The North African desert at noon time is very hot because the sun shines directly down from over head so makes it very uncomfortable for humans.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
With regards to women, Napoleon was known to have said, "Women ought to obey us. Nature has made women our slaves!" The components of his Code provide evidence of this belief in the following way.
-Napoleon stated that men were superior to women. Period. As clear as that.
-The husband had complete authority over his wife and not only that, but it also had authority over the finances and money of the wife.
-When getting married, the husband was responsible for the administration of the wealthy of both. This wealth was combined and the husband could decide on how to use the assets without the permission or authorization of the wife.
-Getting the divorce was practically impossible. The only probable cause for separation was if the wife was physically abused.