1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stich3 [128]
3 years ago
12

GIVING BRAINLYIST PLZ HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

History
1 answer:
Charra [1.4K]3 years ago
5 0
Idk wnsndbdbdbbdhdhdhdhdhdvdvdbdbdbbdbd
You might be interested in
How did Alexander gain control of all of Greece??????
TiliK225 [7]

Alexander The Great as he was known, was and excellent, sophisticated military leader considered by many historians as a genius.  Thanks to his greatness, Alexander the Great was able to practically changed the nature of the ancient world by himself in less than 10 years.

When he was in front of his armies he commanded them by example. The fact that he considered himself to be indestructible made him gamble, and  take extreme risks with his own life as well as the soldiers he lead.  

He was born in July of 356 BC in  the city of Pella which was the capital of Macedonia at the time. Also and most importantly,  he was educated by the great philosopher  Aristotle. After his father assassination Philip II in 336 BC, young Alexander took control of the kingdom his father left. Unfortunately, the kingdom was in a very precarious and volatile situation which he quickly was able to put under control by defeating all of those who opposed him at home. Later, he went on to conquer and control the entire Persian Empire.

Thanks to all of these attributes of courage, ingenuity and self confidence,   Alexander the Great was able to control and maintain a firm grip on Greece and the whole Persian Empire.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did the roman empire fall because of internal problems or external problems
tiny-mole [99]
Internal problems. hope that helps

7 0
3 years ago
“If a nation is attacked the only recourse is to attack back” Agree or disagree and why?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Not really,

It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
 some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct answer.
masha68 [24]
C. The government regulates the economy completely
4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HURRY IM ON MY FINAL!!
IrinaK [193]
This is missing the websites URL.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Silk Road is MOST associated with
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best example of an ethnic category? A. Homo sapien B. Caucasian C. Kongo D. Black
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following was not a major battle of World War I?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the main effect of the contract with america?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the economic base of the Dutch colony called new Amsterdam on Manhattan island
    8·1 answer
  • Help?! will mark the brainliest
    9·1 answer
  • I need more help ;-; IYHAGSFHDJK
    7·2 answers
  • Was the first king tried and convicted of treason against his own country.
    14·1 answer
  • True or False? The French settled most of what is now Canada, the Great Lakes, Ohio River Valley, and the Mississippi River.​
    8·1 answer
  • Please help (30 points)<br> Versailles treaty
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!