Answer: Consideration of American responses to Nazism during the 1930s and 1940s raises questions about the responsibility to intervene in response to persecution or genocide in another country. As soon as Hitler assumed power in 1933, Americans had access to information about Nazi Germany’s persecution of Jews and other groups. Although some Americans protested Nazism, there was no sustained, nationwide effort in the United States to oppose the Nazi treatment of Jews. Even after the US entered World War II, the government did not make the rescue of Jews a major war aim. (I think this is it i dont know im pretty sure)
The people would respond favorable to a change in leadership if the current government fails to do what they said they would do (the positive things at least), fail to even do the minimum, or the people just don't like the current leader for one reason or another
hope this helps
The third option is the answer
It would be the "Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)" that was not one of the programs initiated by President Roosevelt as part of his New Deal, since New Deal Programs were intended to dig the US out of the grips of the Great Depression.
Some mining camps started to grow into towns or cities as more people started pooling into the mining camps the population started expanding and also precious metals like gold was often found.
Explanation:
The population explosion required more building as camps could no longer accommodate such huge numbers.
Mining also led to employment, a boom in business and prospects of a healthy income on a regular basis. The finding of gold further led to wealthy business prospects.
As the camps started changing into towns and cities with more settlements facilities like railroads, schools and hospitals along with markets were also built.
