D. It was saying how slaves counted as 3/5ths of a person while voting.
Answer:
The ONE major difference between Wood’s and Bailyn’s historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British is:
According to Wood, the American colonies rebelled and revolted out of reasoned principle. They had the mindset that they were "born heirs of freedom" and that freedom is their everyday life. While, according to Bailyn, the colonies rebelled and revolted due to the rise of conspirators who stood against their freedom.
Explanation:
Wood's and Bailey's historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British can be seen from the excerpt. It's evident that their interpretations differ.
Wood revealed that the Americans didn't rebel due to suffering but due to a "reasoned principle". Whereas, Bailey interpreted it to be that the conspirators against the liberty propelled the revolt.
The correct answer is letter D. <span>The Court’s decisions supported civil rights, civil liberties, and voting rights. The Warren Court was the Supreme Court of the United States that was head by Chief Justice Earl Warren. He had a way of using his judicial power in a dramatic fashion where he focused on expanding the latter.</span>
INDRA is the correct answer of your not sure just look it up and it’ll show up in google
