(this is based on my opinion, since this is an opinion prompt)
I do believe that the Good Samaritan laws are a good idea. This is an especially good idea due to the fact that people may suddenly collapse in public with no trained medical professionals nearby. People may collapse due to choking and lack of air. This person would have a much higher chance if someone were to step in and either preform CPR, the Heimlich Maneuver, or whatever else that person requires in order to survive. If you were to standby and do nothing, and attempt to contact emergency responders, it may already be too late for the victim, the person might end up dying due to the ambulance not arriving on time. If the Good Samaritan law were to be put a stop to, many more people would end up dying in the long run due to there not being any law to protect bystanders who wish to intervene.
Among the other achievements of Reconstruction were the South's first state-funded public school systems, more equitable taxation legislation, laws against racial discrimination in public transport and accommodations and ambitious economic development programs (including aid to railroads and other enterprises).
Explanation:
<h2>MARK ME BRAINLIEST PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</h2>
The leaders of the peace party hoped that Stephen Austin would make the decision of acceding Texas with the United States after his return from Mexico.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The leaders of the peace the party had tried to persuade Stephen Austin, the empressario of Texas, to accede the territory of Texas with the United States for a long time.
They wished that after Stephen Austin's return from Texas he makes an appeal to the residents of Texas telling them that they were now becoming a part of the United States.
One of the ways in which English kings increased their power and reduce the power of the nobles was that they "strengthened the courts"--since this allowed more of their laws and decrees to pass.
