¿Cual es la diferencia entre epidemia,pandemia y endemia?

I need the answer asap . If you can help plz do so .

AleksAgata [21]

Answer: Monopolistic Explanation: Monopolistic competition characterizes an industry in which many firms offer products or services that are similar, but not perfect substitutes. Barriers to entry and exit in a monopolistic competitive industry are low, and the decisions of any one firm do not directly affect those of its competitors. Monopolistic competition is closely related to the business strategy of brand differentiation. Key Takeaways: 1. Monopolistic competition occurs when an industry has many firms offering products that are similar but not identical. 2. Unlike a monopoly, these firms have little power to set curtail supply or raise prices to increase profits. 3. Firms in monopolistic competition typically try to differentiate their product in order to achieve in order to capture above market returns. 4. Heavy advertising and marketing is common among firms in monopolistic competition and some economists criticize this as wasteful.

8 0

4 years ago

Farming practices that increase production levels through the use of chemical fertilizers and technology to compensate for a sma

klemol [59]

Answer: The correct answer is INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE or INTENSIVE FARMING.

Explanation:

INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE also called intensive farming is a system of agriculture whereby there is increased use of capital and labor to increase production in comparison to the available land.

The aim of intensive farming is to maximize yields from the land available through different means. Examples of such means include; heavy use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What 5 or more things are you going to do this summer

Vaselesa [24]

Sneak out
swim
go out to eat
hopefully go on a road trip because i’m so bored at home
and get my drivers license

5 0

3 years ago

Write a paragraph in which you make a claim and develop a line of reasoning that effectively incorporates the evidence provided.

In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

Answer:Claims, Reasons, and Evidence

Argument in its most basic form consists of three parts:

A claim

Reasons to support the claim

Evidence to support the reasons

In some cases, including only these three components will be sufficient to demonstrate the merits of your ideas and persuade the reader, but in others you will need to go beyond these, incorporating counterarguments and/or warrants. For now, though, let’s focus our attention on what claims, reasons, and evidence are, as well as ways that you can evaluate the quality of each.

Defining and Evaluating Claims

What is a claim? Simply stated, a claim is a position or stance that the person communicating takes on an issue. Claims exist on a spectrum of complexity; for example, the claim that fruit-flavored candy is better than chocolate is rather minor in comparison to a claim that there is not enough affordable housing in the area, with the former’s focus resting (largely) on dietary preference and the latter’s reach instead extending across financial, political, and educational lines. As you can probably tell then, a claim reflects a position or stance that is the product of a range of influential factors (e.g., biological, psychological, economic, etc.), and as a position or stance it should articulate an idea that is debatable. However, the ability to challenge the claim is not the only criterion that must be met, and the questions below can help guide you in what to look for when evaluating another person’s claim as well as when stating your own.

To evaluate the quality of a claim, consider the following:

Is the claim clearly and specifically stated? Clarity and specificity are key to ensuring that the claim’s intent and scope will be understood, so beware vague and/or broadly stated claims.

Does the claim state an idea that someone not only could debate but also would want to debate? If someone would be uninterested in debating the idea, then it matters little that he/she could do so.

Does the claim state an idea that can effectively be supported? If (sufficient) evidence is unavailable to support a claim, then it may be worthwhile to reconsider the claim’s phrasing and/or scope so that it can be revised to state an idea that can be supported more fully.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

you are asked To lead à meeting about Improving Patients Satisfaction and you have two weeks To prépare for thé meeting explain

slega [8]

As the leader of the meeting, you set the agenda & tone of the meeting. It is the leaders job to provide structure to the meeting, guidance from what upper management expects of the group.
Listen to the group members, maintain order and timely meeting times. It takes practice to learn these behaviors but it can be learned.

Here are some examples:
1) Is the first meeting to set guidelines, goals, future meeting times? Then this is the focus of that first meeting. No more.
2) as leader you will have had time to gather information on which areas need focus on patient satisfaction.
You have the group prioritize which area gets looked at first.

If you need more help let me know.

4 0

4 years ago