The president serves as Commander in Chief of the armed forces, signs or veto legislation passed by Congress and appoint federal judges with the advice and consent of a majority of the Senate. He/she has <span>the power to negotiate and sign treaties, to run the executive brunch, to appoint federal judges and to report to Congress. But, the President has NOT power to enact legislation by issuing decrees and to declare war.
</span>
The correct answer is "It decreases". Numerous studies report that birth rate are higher in developing countries in comparison to developed countries. Once a developing country reaches the status of industrialized it is very likely that the birth rate would decrease. Two factors that explain the high birth rates in developing countries are the lack of access to contraceptives and, generally lower levels of education respect to developed countries.
I think this is a 'cakewalk', a dance battle popular on plantations.
Based on a historical perspective, the United States Constitution establishes federalism, whose effect is that the <u>State government cannot overrule federal laws.</u>
<h3>United States Constitution</h3>
The current United States Constitution is known to have been ratified in 1788 and became operational in 1789.
The Current United States Constitution was implemented to succeed the Articles of Confederation which gave the State government the power to overrule federal laws on many issues concerning the nation.
However, due to many weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, the United States later adopted the current United States Constitution.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>State government cannot overrule federal laws."</u>
Learn more about the United States Constitution here: brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ1
Answer:
states have the right to decide whether or not federal laws will be followed within their borders
Explanation:
The Constitution’s Supremacy Clause clearly stated that federal law is the ‘supreme Law of the Land. Despite the arguments against the theory of nullification, state governments have continued to uphold the theory of nullification, citing that they have the powers to declare certain federal governments’ laws to be null and void.
Certain crisis around nullification was seen in the history of the united states around 1832 between the federal government of the country and south Carolina because the state moved to declare null and void the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832
.
