How did Americans disagree over the role of federal and state governments before and during the civil war ?

History

2 answers:

Oksi-84 [34.3K]2 years ago

7 0

Trust the first answer. They are correct. (Award them brainliest because that answer was amazing)

MAXImum [283]2 years ago

5 0

From what I can remember, states' rights was a large factor contributing to the Civil War. With Lincoln becoming president and representing the North, the Southern states seceded, leading to a war. The state governments of the South argued that since the Constitution and the federal government was created by the states, the federal government had no right to stop states from seceding. President Lincoln and other northerners disagreed and wanted to preserve the Union by stopping states from seceding.
After the war, I believe the South still disagreed on a strong federal government. They wanted to rule the area by themselves.

You might be interested in

Describe the location of Russia in relation to the Arctic Ocean

svet-max [94.6K]

B, the Arctic Ocean borders Russia only to the North

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following is NOT a statement written in the bill of rights?

lions [1.4K]

I think that the answer is A

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the Israelite religion develop

Alexeev081 [22]

The main religion in Israel is Judaim, and it developed around 3000 or even 4000 years ago. It is also called "Abrahamic" because of Abraham, a man who received calling from God. The religion developed through many men such as Abraham and the ones who came after him, who received revelations from God throughout the early development of Judaism.

5 0

3 years ago

Country X and Country Y are trading partners. Both countries grow wheat and both countries produce smartphones. Country X has la

posledela

Answer: A

Explanation: country x has ideal land conditions for farming so it would be better for growing wheat. Country y has a strong technology industry making it better for producing smart phones and it is also small and densely populated meaning it would be hard to grow wheat. So if the two countries trade they could both gain something and benefit.

3 0

2 years ago

Question 3 of 10

Tomtit [17]

Answer:

A. Cultural differences

Explanation:

Europeans considered Indians to be savages because of their way of living the life. Europeans considered Indians inferior to their way of living. The clothes worn by Indians, the food they ate, the types of houses they lived in were different and inferior to that of the Europeans. During the eighteenth century, the term "savage" was propounded with a different meaning as it is the current times. During that time, the inferior behavior and way of living was considered as savage. Indians way of living was given the name of savagery by the Europeans.

6 0

2 years ago