Doing what?????????????????????
Answer:
He ordered the attorney general to file a lawsuit against Northern Securities because its creation violated anti-trust law.
Explanation:
No, the freedom of speech is one of the most important rights in a democracy along with the freedom of press. It allows several voices to rise and be heard. But it does not means that you can say whatever you want whenever you want.
You can find the foundations of the freedom of speech in the first amendment where it says:
<em>"Amendment I
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Congress </em><em>shall make no law </em><em>respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or </em><em>abridging the freedom of speech</em><em>, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" </em>
But there are exceptions to the rule. You can´t say whatever you want as the supreme court have showed in several cases. From this we can extract some categories where the first amendment doesn´t work:
- Incitement: When its directed to inciting or producing inminent lawless action.
- False statements of facts: there are some types of this unprotected according to the supreme court: those said with <em>"sufficiently culpable mental state" </em>can be subject of criminal or civil liability. Secondly libel and slander and finally negligent statements or facts can be subject of civil liability.
As a conclusion we can say that the freedom of speech is a fundamental right in a healthy democracy but we must take care of it. We can´t say whatever we want, well actually we can but you have to be responsible of your acts.
t is difficult for the public due to red tapism and the fact that the leaders are good at hiding facts.
Explanation:
Red tapism is one of the things that have led many bureaucrats to simply cover up the traces of their questionable deeds in tucked away files that are only revealed after 30 or 40 years.
This makes it difficult for the public to assess them in terms of the information they have as the information that reaches is generally inaccurate and incomplete.
It also has to do with the fact that politicians are constantly trying to save face through PR and also other shady tactics that muddy up the image more.
The best translation for incitaverat is :
third-person singular<span> pluperfect </span>active indicative<span> of </span><span>incitō.
One example of the word usage would be
<em>. . . .serenissimum </em><em>regem</em><em> Francorum in </em><em>eum</em><em> </em><em>graviter</em><em> incitaverat . . . . </em></span>
